Lottery Syndicate Agreement Template
Lottery Syndicate Agreement Template- free 6 significance of lottery syndicate forms in pdf manuel l quezon iii – punditry politics history mentary sbi credit card application form pdf layaway contract sample free 6 significance of lottery syndicate forms in pdf corporate counsels guide to distribution counseling index prenuptial agreement definition unique lottery syndicate contract law a final exam notes romark flowr corp registration of a class of securities of certain
Manuel L Quezon III – Punditry Politics History mentary from Lottery Syndicate Agreement Template, source:quezon.ph
Sbi Credit Card Application Form Pdf from Lottery Syndicate Agreement Template, source:dolpin.oneway2.me
Sample Example & Format Templates Free Excel, Doc, PDF, xls lottery syndicate agreement form pdf lottery syndicate agreement template lottery syndicate agreement template free shifting nps account sectors in nps form iss the latest tioga co pa democrats credit agreement dated as of july 10 2014 among twin river daily 301 legal forms letters and agreements sample chapter 20 awesome artist release agreement bulletin of neoliberal pseudoeconomics 2020 lottery syndicate agreement form 6 free templates in pdf 100 [ confidentiality agreement template free download free 6 significance lottery syndicate forms in pdf
IFR private Placements Roundtable 2015: half 1 IFR: Welcome to IFR’s inaugural private placement roundtable. deepest placements have received lots of attention of late: from the perspective of moves against Capital Markets Union in Europe; and consequently both of market conditions brought about with the aid of fiscal stimulus and liquidity circumstances caused with the aid of rules. i wanted to kick off with a extremely customary query. When we say deepest placements, what are we really talking about? making an allowance for we have US inner most placements, Euro PP, Schuldschein, German and UK deepest placements; direct non-bank lending (which some americans confer with as deepest offers); and issuance beneath MTN programmes, it’s no longer altogether evident if there’s an authorized definition. We even have unlisted and listed securities; syndicated and pre-placed transactions. Stuart: what are your options on this? Stuart Hitchcock, NYL traders: My definition can be an unlisted, unregistered, long-time period, purchase-and-cling dedication principally out to 1 or more institutional investors in bond format. That’s likely as simplistic as I might put it. it would now not encompass, at least in my eyes, issuance below EMTN programmes. maybe they’re quasi-PP. I additionally wouldn’t include Schuldschein – a German financial institution vogue of financing below brief bond-style files – as ordinary PP. Alain Gallois, Natixis: I think there are two definitions: a criminal one the place concerns are pre-placed earlier than launch; and public transactions which are dispensed through retail via what in French is referred to as an offre au public, so a public providing like we even have within the US and Europe. For the bulk of the market, deepest placements are non-liquid, small sized, private transactions placed with a small number of buy-and-dangle buyers. IFR: Can they be listed? Alain Gallois, Natixis: They will also be listed or non-listed, as this market is also open to personal loan structure. nowadays, what we now have developed with the Euro PP market is certainly a listed market, anything somewhat transparent, in distinction to the Schuldschein market which is greater a non-listed market. Stuart Hitchcock, NYL traders: when it comes to the size, just to outline what i would describe as a PP, it may also be anything from US$20m equal anywhere as much as US$2bn and in terms of the investors, the number isn’t in fact an incredible aspect. we are able to see it bilaterally the entire method up to 25–30 buyers. That could be the variety of range that i might customarily see in a PP. IFR: Richard, where do Schuldschein healthy into this, from the viewpoint of a strict definition of inner most placements? Richard Waddington, Commerzbank: I feel we all have our own views on what they’re, however one of the general threads [of private placements] is that they’re non-liquid instruments issued by means of unrated mid-market corporates and sold to purchase-to-grasp traders. each of the distinct items you outlined on your introduction is coming at it from a just a little diverse attitude but, finally, I believe the important thing threads are: unrated credit, non-liquid, purchase-to-cling investors. Tenor-sensible it varies, the Schuldschein market doesn’t go as lengthy on the whole as the USPP market; it’s extra based on what you see within the Euro PP market in five, seven, to 10 years for unrated company credit. Schuldschein can have a lot longer tenors however these aren’t what I classify as inner most placements; they’re extra equivalent to public issuance with the aid of German issuers. IFR: On challenge measurement, taking into account Stuart’s point out of USPP issues up to US$2bn and making an allowance for ZF’s contemporary €2bn Schuldschein, where does that leave Alain’s definition, about concerns being pre-placed, for the reason that these are syndicated. Richard Waddington, Commerzbank: ZF was an anomaly, albeit a very enjoyable anomaly. It hit the candy spot out there, launching at €300m and blowing out at €2.2bn. That was a mix of alluring pricing, and the correct credit with the correct profile. nevertheless it was a generally syndicated placement, so I wouldn’t classify that because the common private placement type route for ordinary Schuldschein, Euro PP or US PP. but like US PP, in Europe, they can additionally get huge concerns as well. Hitting US$1bn is at a big scale, however can also be finished. We’ve considered very huge concerns in Euro PP as well. In summary, there are anomalies for the entire items. Richard Waddington, Commerzbank: ZF became obviously an anomaly albeit a really unique anomaly. It hit the sweet spot out there, launching at €200m and blowing out €2.2bn. That became absolutely a mixture of pricing, the correct credit score with the right profile but it turned into a widely syndicated placement so I wouldn’t classify that because the typical deepest placement classification route for commonplace Schuldschein, Euro PP or US PP. but like US PP, in Europe they could also get huge concerns as neatly. Hitting US$1bn is at a huge scale but it surely can also be executed. We’ve seen very massive considerations in Euro PP as smartly. In abstract there are anomalies for all the products but they do happen. Alain Gallois, Natixis: to return returned to Stuart’s factor, we like massive deepest placements; we opt to work for US$2bn than US$20m. Emilie Wong, ING: From our perspective, what we call deepest placements is funding via an unrated SME. we’re seeing greater move-border recreation, so fewer French SMEs coming to the Euro PP market, and greater diversification. For us inner most placements are tailored financing options carried out under the radar to a few chosen buyers. What we might call private placements is anything from €50m up to probably €500m. which we’ve viewed in the market from some French SMEs. however most significantly, it has to be below the radar and tailored widely in a maturity latitude of five to maybe 10 years. So naturally they’re not publicly announced and there are no massive roadshows. They’re bilateral discussions with between one and 10 key buyers per transaction. IFR: Nick, let me come to you. You chair the Pan-European deepest Placement Working community. I think about these forms of existential questions got here up to your deliberations. Nicholas Pfaff, ICMA: The answers so far illustrate the issue that should you consult with a private placement, there’s a range of views and a range of products. the broader problem is that you should privately place any type of safety, so it’s additionally a technique. if you try to turn it right into a product, you must make an effort to define it each when it comes to what it is presently within the European market and also possibly what it may also be if we’re going to show this into a much bigger market. certainly, in the efforts that we made in the Pan European private Placement Working community, we spent loads of time on definitions and we’ve one which I’m completely satisfied to claim often coated what become mentioned, however we emphasised the unlisted element of the market. IFR: On that certain aspect, when you see a stock market [i.e. Euronext] launching a private placement section, what do you think about that? Nicholas Pfaff, ICMA: As Alain talked about, the Euro PP market has developed as a listed market as a result of a constraint within the French coverage code (Code des Assurances). That has since been lifted so there’s a fashion now faraway from a market that has traditionally been predominantly listed to one which these days is roughly half-half between listed and unlisted transactions. Euronext has indeed launched a product to serve the listed part. I consider we deserve to see how the market reacts to that. it will possibly well be that the market would need to preserve a listed component of the privately-placed market. It doesn’t make our definitional efforts more straightforward, but I feel we need to retain an open mind, whereas on the same time recognising that in case you step returned from the Euro PP market, commonly one in all key characteristics is it’s an unlisted market. Stuart Hitchcock, NYL traders: what is a Euro PP? The name receives bandied around lots however from a 3rd-celebration perspective, it’s just a little of an odd one since it seems as though there are lots of local markets that have all the time been there. The French market has performed a pretty good job recently of increasing issuance for certain kinds of provider, but we’re not speaking Pan-European PP. What’s the precise definition of that? Alain Gallois, Natixis: The initiative got here from the home French market, which noticed its initial transaction in 2012. Why? as a result of on the one hand something like 20% to 25% of the euro company market is made up of French issuers and we’ve considered lots of knowledge with SMEs. in spite of this, there’s a true drive from huge buyers in France who are trying to find diversification, new names, yield decide upon-up and many others. Some traders, principally the massive assurance agencies and asset managers stated: “I wish to go into non-liquid, non-rated small caps which have a nice story; my buyside analyst can do the credit score work and i can take €20m-€30m out of a €60m trade.” That’s Euro PP. After that initiative, the Pan-European Working community became convened to are trying and construct from the values of the French and create a real European market which doesn’t exist notwithstanding within the Euro PP market we’re now seeing extra non-French issuers and non-French traders coming in, especially seeing that the beginning of 2015. Jason Rothenberg, MetLife inner most Capital investors: the place do the non-French investors are typically from? Alain Gallois, Natixis: you have UK guys, the Swiss, Belgium, Italy and it’s particularly dollars, asset managers, some existence coverage, deepest banking and some banks. IFR: Jason, let me come to you. Given your focus on the USPP market, are you bemused through the volume of the noise rising in the past 12 months to 18 months around European private placements and the fact that we’re definitely having the dialog of what inner most placements are, because’s fairly clear within the US? Jason Rothenberg, MetLife inner most Capital traders: it’s relatively clear within the US PP market. The discussion highlights that there are a lot of adjustments between the various markets you outlined; the Schuldschein market which has been around for quite a very long time and the Euro PP market which is more moderen. however in terms of the kinds of organizations that method the house, the ordinary maturity, the average credit pleasant or the dimension of the deals, it’s different in each and every market. probably the most issues I suppose about when I feel about the definition of inner most placements is that each deal is privately negotiated, so in most instances we start with a template. within the US PP promote it’s the model form of the note purchase contract however there’s an opportunity to barter some of the keywords of that doc. We’ve had people call us every so often and say they’re doing a ‘deepest placement’ and announcing it that morning and needing to take bids that afternoon. That, in my mind is by no means a private placement as a result of deepest placements contain a certain quantity of credit score evaluation and negotiation of documentation. The procedure is a part of that definition. To clarify one more point, I suppose about 30% of the deals that get executed within the common US PP market are rated businesses; it’s now not just for unrated agencies however for rated organizations that need to diversify their sources of financing in a special market. IFR: On the element about privately negotiated transactions, how private can or not it’s if there are 10 of you involved within the negotiation? Are bilaterals the candy spot or are you satisfied seeing others in there? Jason Rothenberg, MetLife deepest Capital buyers: We’re chuffed to work despite the fact the issuer prefers to work. Issuers have the alternative of doing a commonly marketed company transaction, which is much of what we do. they can also put together a smaller membership deal or they can work bilaterally with just one investor. when it comes to the negotiation, there’s a chance, even on the widely marketed offers where there’s a couple of investors, to deliver feedback on counseled time period changes or issues that we’d want to see with a purpose to be in a position to get extra comfy with the deal. these items get fed in the course of the agent returned to the enterprise and the business’s tips, and sometimes they are covered within the deal, so there’s always a chance to have an impact on the structure. IFR: How open is that system? in case you’re offering comments in the course of the agents or through information, do you have got a sense of what other counterparties in the exchange might be proposing? Jason Rothenberg, MetLife inner most Capital investors: No. customarily that could just go again in the course of the agent and the agent could tell us if other americans are asking for a similar things or no longer. It is not a condition the place we’re talking to other skills traders at the same time. IFR: Stuart, would that jive with your journey? Stuart Hitchcock, NYL investors: completely. The issuer is the focal point and it’s a privately negotiated deal. The best thing i might add to Jason’s comment: because it is negotiated, because it is bendy, it’s open to all method of styles of financing or credit so it will also be funding grade, sub-funding grade, mission, infrastructure, unsecured, secured, public, inner most, it can also be covenanted, it will also be uncovenanted with a most favoured lender’s clause most effective. the flexibility of the doc that we now have and the skill to negotiate it and present it out to both small organizations and additionally the greatest and biggest and even the huge rated companies enable it to be absolutely bendy. Calum Macphail, M&G: Going lower back to the element about why the focal point has been so a great deal on Europe over the closing 12 to 18 months, there has been amazing desire to look European corporates – which historically had been very reliant on banks – transition to a greater balanced funding mannequin. You’ve seen that in the public markets where corporates have more and more long gone and issued public bonds. The pressure towards deepest placement markets in Europe is set trying to carry that down to the subsequent size of business and create a funding menu for them that goes past comfortably bank funding. IFR: So right here’s my political query. To what extent, making an allowance for the work of the Pan European inner most Placement Working community that you simply also sit on, are you being forced via the public coverage agenda to create give and demand for whatever thing that isn’t in fact there? Calum Macphail, M&G: As an investor we’re always attracted to investment opportunities and starting to be the pie of where we are able to go to. Diversifying these alternatives needs to be an outstanding element. What you call the market to a degree is inappropriate. If it’s a good business that we get the probability to lend to, why wouldn’t we have an interest? Ash Shah, Barclays: From the standpoint of a financial institution working and trafficking out there, we analyze all the corporations that prospectively are looking to difficulty, whether they’re rated or unrated however peculiarly – as Calum aspects out – one of the most guys who this initiative is targeted at: the small and medium dimension firms that well-nigh via definition might be unrated and on the way to are looking to do an unlisted offer as a result of their fees are decrease. we will’t be doing listed offers as a result of investors wish to do them. The provider has to pay for it so an unlisted option is essential to them. if you feel about that, there are lots of corporates that want funding across Europe. if you analyze our company bank, which manages many of these class of company relationships, we haven’t any scarcity of enquiry round that. I feel Calum’s point is appropriate in that the U.S. PP market has completed an excellent job of making an attempt to fund a few of those however there’s still a stratum of business that doesn’t get access to that market. I’m speaking about ones that are inclined to fall even below what the united states PP market tends to be decent at. There are size biases or business biases or whatever thing it should be would becould very well be. That’s not to say the united states PP market can’t get there; it actually can, but if we will promote different investors into what is functioning already, every person’s at an advantage, issuers and buyers. And we’ll be doing our bit for the political world too. FTSE 250 corporations have access to a perfectly decent US PP market which can also incorporate European investors and sometimes does. however does the FTSE 350, does the next layer down have access to capital when banks have extensively retreated and are not going to move back and fund these agencies? it truly is the query we don’t recognize the answer to but if as a group we can increase some thing, it’s going to have wide take-up. Richard Waddington, Commerzbank: in case you look again over the final four or five years, unrated corporates didn’t have that many options. there were either bank loans or US PP. What you’re seeing right here is the boom and building of the market, and clearly there’s political assist for it. but the situation is: however we’re making an attempt to push for a more unified market, I consider the market is at all times going to stay fragmented to a undeniable extent in Europe because of the diverse law, distinct regulatory bases and diverse investor bases. It’s essential to are attempting and harmonise it, but that you could most effective get to this point. It’s a experience we’re all on. the united states circumstance is simpler, they’ve obtained greater standardised documentation. it is going to evidently be negotiated however, on the end of the day, you’re working with one legislations and there’s a an awful lot deeper investor base. We haven’t obtained that in Europe. It’s developing, even though, and it’s going to be unique to peer the place we come out. We’re all attempting to tug within the identical route in terms of getting more liquidity, and greater issuers available in the market, however the fragmented nature of the market ability that the ecu Market is not likely to strengthen in this kind of homogenous manner as the US PP market. Calum Macphail, M&G: I a bit of disagree with Richard. There’s a part of actuality in what he says however we just don’t know and i agree it’s a event. however we need to bear in mind that the U.S. market has also been on a experience to get the place it is these days and it has got a longer heritage that isn’t helping the ecu market at this aspect in time. hence, to expect them to turn into similar is somewhat unfair. IFR: Brian, let me bring you in on this one. Is the hassle and business being expended on the building of a pan-European deepest placement market a waste of time? should we no longer be focusing on morphing the U.S. inner most placement market to accommodate the distinct issuers available in the market, given its standardised documentation? Brian Bates, Morrison & Foerster: I don’t want to use the words ‘waste of time’ as a result of any time we’re making an attempt to expand the markets, permit more traders, bring greater traders into the market, make the market obtainable to more issuers, that’s at all times a fine recreation. What I do discover unhelpful from an issuer’s standpoint is the fragmentation we’re speaking about. I suppose lots of this has to do with the want for contributors available in the market to create new items to be able to have an avenue for their funding or for their legislations establishments to be worried in a market they’re now not in particular adept at presently. developing new items for these motives isn’t in particular helpful. To Ash’s element, we’ve been making an attempt for years to get a lot of European buyers involved within the USPP market and that’s been more and more a success over time. I wish that could be the focal point of the activity. I desire the center of attention of the national governments could be to recognize that we already have an latest set of documentation that has survived the worst monetary disaster considering that the incredible depression. although it’s technically an illiquid market, it in reality isn’t illiquid. that could improvement European investors as neatly. From the issuers’ perspective, it’s simply standard economics; the bigger a market is, the extra aggressive it is and the more advantageous pricing and phrases you’re going to get as an issuer. So fragmentation I don’t agree with is helpful, but it surely’s now not a waste of time to are trying to develop other alternate options. Calum Macphail, M&G: Isn’t it a question of segmentation in preference to fragmentation, and saying that the U.S. market has historically only been inclined to fund one stratum of enterprise? Brian Bates, Morrison & Foerster: Calum and that i were on so many panels collectively, I believe like we’re the siblings who can never agree. I think the term ‘US inner most placement’ is fully outdated. For years now, half of the market is non-US issuers and, despite the fact that it’s smaller than we wish, a good portion of the market is non-US traders. I coined the phrase ‘world inner most placement market’ and that i really accept as true with that the so-known as US PP market is a world inner most placement market. We do deals in Asia, Europe, the U.S., Canada, South the us, Australia, wherever. If that’s not a global private placement market, I don’t know what is. private, by the way, has nothing to do with the mechanics that americans have referred to to this point today; it’s the fact that the protection, no matter if debt or fairness, is not meant to be placed with the typical public. The different elements that have been introduced up are mechanics. IFR: Emilie, whether you call it segmentation or fragmentation, are there merits for issuers? I ask because it strikes me if the quite a lot of markets are at diverse features of their cycles, issuers might also get more desirable execution in one section than yet another. Emilie Wong, ING: Fragmentation has benefited some buyers massively. It’s value mentioning also that some jurisdictions are more flexible in terms of covenants. Some investor bases can do Euro PP with none covenants, whereas others need to have them. Fragmentation additionally helps the issuer because they could select and decide counting on the dimension they want to elevate. Some markets, for example, will not help you raise €500m. if you don’t have some key traders from definite jurisdictions like France, you’re certainly not going to raise €500m in the Euro PP market. If, despite the fact, you’re a family-owned business, if you want to evade disclosure but you are aiming to raise €50m–€100m that you could prefer and choose between markets and be more flexible. At this stage, fragmentation may also additionally lead some investors to take competencies of the flexibleness allowed by using less harmonisation and push for bilateral deals, to get stronger allocation, to seize assets they are looking to access for diversification purposes. Ash Shah, Barclays: in case you analyze how the deepest swimming pools of capital in the world have developed, they’ve developed via becoming homogenous. appear at the Eurobond market. It’s developed right into a multi-trillion dollar market since it’s homogenous. seem to be at the public greenback market, the deepest pool of capital on the earth because it’s homogenous. If we’re going to try and galvanise buyers and issuers to improve a pan-European market, let’s no longer focus on UK buyers and UK issuers, French issuers and French investors; it’s about being pan-European. and also you should get some degree of homogeneity into documentation. I suppose Brian’s point is correct which is if you’ve received an entire stratum of groups, French, Italian, UK, Australian, wherever they are on the planet, that are already doing deals on a broad set of common terms with just a few adaptations as Jason outlined, that’s already found a base of issuance. What definitely should take place – and Calum and that i agree on this – is that traders need to be challenged on funding to do offers for the stratum of company that doesn’t have entry to that market even now. it is the key. in the meanwhile we’re doing deals for the FTSE a hundred, FTSE 250, DAX 30, CAC forty. however what concerning the subsequent layer down and the next layer down? What governments are difficult us to locate is an answer for is small and medium corporations. If we go to a small company with a treasury crew of one with 10 funding alternatives they’re never going to be capable of sensibly sift through all of these options. We should supply something that in reality is largely uniform with diversifications as are essential for that company or that investor in particular. if in case you have numerous options, that’s good enough for a big enterprise with a sophisticated treasury team to evaluate. nevertheless it’s not fair to challenge a mid-cap with that. We need to be big satisfactory to be in a position to say: “This should fit most investors in Europe bar one or two covenant changes or some workouts round that, that may still work”. That’s what the Eurobond market does. There’s now not a major quantity of difference between kinds of Eurobonds but it’s [the uniformity] that receives investors purchasing and trading them. That’s the place the Pan European PP market should still be in terms of a modus operandi. we can get decent deals executed rapidly and everyone is aware of what they’re about and it’s a uniform market. everybody right here is aware of what a Eurobond is in the main. If we’re going to get to pan-European market of a material depth and size, I consider we want some thing like that. Richard Waddington, Commerzbank: You’re right: it’s critical to carrier the next layer of issuers that isn’t currently neatly provided for. You’ve acquired the documentational point which is being pushed, however the largest problem when it comes to establishing the market is taking place the credit curve and getting extra investors to take part. There are a lot of institutional traders that nonetheless struggle with unrated credit. France is a really good instance of how that has developed. In Germany, the institutional market isn’t as neatly developed and that’s partly because of the regulatory concerns. Pushing buyers to go down the credit curve and getting comfortable with unrated credits is our greatest problem. You’re appropriate: it’s important to provider the next layer of issuers that isn’t broadly serviced right here. You’ve got the docs side which is being pushed, but where the greatest problem is in terms of constructing the market is to head down the curve and get more buyers taking a look at it. There are loads of institutions that, for instance, nevertheless battle with unrated credit. France is a very first rate instance of how that’s developed. In Germany, too, the institutional market is not as developed as it should be and that’s partly a regulatory difficulty. Pushing buyers to move down and get relaxed with unrated credit and going down the curve is our greatest challenge. Nicholas Pfaff, ICMA: I’m getting a little bit involved in regards to the use of SME terminology. We should focus on medium-sized companies. there’s a threshold we don’t want to go beneath. In our discussions within the working neighborhood, there’s a transparent consensus that at some element you attain an organization measurement which is in reality premiere serviced by means of banks. The banks have the numbers, they’ve the history, they’ve obtained the branches. What we’re in reality speakme about is medium-sized or intermediate-sized, what within the UK is known as mid and mid-cap plus. I feel it’s crucial to frame that because the SME time period, slightly just like the inner most placement term, is very elastic. Alain Gallois, Natixis: I agree. We have to be very careful concerning the measurement of enterprise we recommend to buyers. It can be a perilous online game and could wreck the market. On the problem of fragmentation, I’m now not certain the markets are fragmented; they’re simply at a number of levels of construction. US PP is a global market, you’re correct. but who cares? The crucial issue is to have equipment obtainable for issuers that fit with what investors need to have of their portfolio. Harmonisation is at all times key in facilitating what we are looking to do: finance small and mid-cap companies within the real economic climate and put them in front of investors who absolutely deserve to diversify and to find new credit to invest in. To be clear: the first step of the Euro PP market become around diversification into the mid-cap section. the primary effort of the Euro PP market was: “I wish to have my full allocation. offers are seven, eight 10 times oversubscribed. I’m fed up with this form of transaction, I need my full allocation”. Then we saw these big traders equipping themselves with analysts who were capable of take into account and analyse smaller credit and they moved right into a decrease range when it comes to the size of the business. I’m no longer talking right here about satisfactory as a result of there are small or mid caps which have exquisite pleasant. but this is how we developed the Euro PP market which is extra of a French market today nevertheless it’s a real mid-cap market that is opening to new styles of issuers. Brian Bates, Morrison & Foerster: Why are the French calling it a european inner most placement market when it’s French? We don’t call it the Missouri deepest placement market. Alain Gallois, Natixis: It’s advertising and marketing. corporate SSD Issuance: correct 10 non-German offers 2014Corporate SSD Issuance: exact 10 non-German offers 2014BorrowerCountry of IssuerDeal dimension (€m)VoestalpineAustria250.00Petrobras DistribuidoraBrazil225.00Regus GroupUnited Kingdom210.00OrpeaFrance203.00RHIAustria170.00AT&S Austria Technologie & SystemtechnikAustria157.95Pennon GroupUnited Kingdom150.00Akka TechnologiesFrance140.00Energie BurgenlandAustria140.00UmdaschAustria140.00Source: Thomson Reuters LPCCorporate SSD Issuance: right 5 non-German deals Q1 2015Corporate SSD Issuance: good 5 non-German deals Q1 2015BorrowerCountry of IssuerDeal measurement (€m)ClariantSwitzerland300.00Ubisoft EntertainmentFrance200.00ArcadisNetherlands170.00LenzingAustria150.00Amer SportsFinland125.00Source: Thomson Reuters LPC.