in the end of the article.

How to Write an Argumentative Essay in 2023?

What is an Argumentative Essay?

An argumentative essay is an essay that presents one side of an argument. It’s a popular form of writing that helps students express their ideas and opinions on a given topic. The goal is to convince the reader that your point of view is the most valid one. To do this, you must present evidence and facts, as well as analyze them in a logical way.

Tips for Writing an Argumentative Essay

1. Choose a Topic You’re Passionate About – Pick a topic you’re interested in, something you can research and write about without getting bored. Choose a topic that has two or more sides to it, so that you can present both sides of the argument and make a convincing case.

2. Research Your Topic – Start by researching both sides of the argument, so that you can present a balanced view. Look for reliable sources like books, journal articles, and online databases. Make sure to reference your sources when you include facts and information.

3. Outline Your Essay – Create an outline of your essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. This will help you stay organized and give you a roadmap to follow. Be sure to include your thesis statement in the introduction.

4. Write Your Essay – Start with an attention-grabbing introduction that presents your argument. Then, use the body paragraphs to present evidence and facts to back your argument. Finally, wrap it up with a strong conclusion that summarizes your points and restates your thesis.

5. Revise and Edit – Once you’ve written your essay, take some time to revise and edit it. Look for any grammar, spelling, or factual errors. Make sure your essay is clear, concise, and persuasive.

Example Argumentative Essay

Sample 1

The debate over the use of animals in medical research is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents of animal research argue that it is necessary in order to advance medical and scientific knowledge. They point to the fact that animals have been used in the development of many life-saving drugs and treatments. On the other hand, opponents argue that it is unethical to use animals in this way, and that other alternatives should be explored. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and present a conclusion.

Proponents of animal research argue that it is a necessary part of the development of new drugs and treatments. They point to the success of animal testing in the development of many life-saving drugs and treatments. Animals, they argue, are similar enough to humans that they can be used as models for testing new drugs and treatments. Opponents, however, argue that animals are not capable of providing informed consent, and that using them in this way is unethical. They also point to the fact that there are other alternatives, such as tissue cultures and computer models, which can be used in place of animals.

In conclusion, the debate over the use of animals in medical research is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents argue that it is necessary in order to advance medical and scientific knowledge, while opponents argue that it is unethical to use animals in this way. While there is no easy answer to this debate, it is clear that both sides of the argument must be considered before a decision can be made.

Sample 2

The debate over the use of nuclear energy is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents of nuclear energy argue that it is a clean and efficient source of energy, while opponents argue that it is dangerous and potentially hazardous to the environment. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and present a conclusion.

Proponents of nuclear energy argue that it is a clean and efficient source of energy. They point to the fact that nuclear plants produce no greenhouse gases, and that nuclear energy does not rely on fossil fuels. Opponents, however, argue that nuclear energy is dangerous and potentially hazardous to the environment. They point to the potential for disasters, such as meltdowns, as well as the fact that nuclear waste is difficult to store safely.

In conclusion, the debate over the use of nuclear energy is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents argue that it is a clean and efficient source of energy, while opponents argue that it is dangerous and potentially hazardous to the environment. While there is no easy answer to this debate, it is clear that both sides of the argument must be considered before a decision can be made.

Sample 3

The debate over the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents of GMOs argue that they can be used to increase crop yields and reduce the use of pesticides, while opponents argue that they are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and present a conclusion.

Proponents of GMOs argue that they can be used to increase crop yields and reduce the use of pesticides. They point to the fact that GMOs can be engineered to be more resistant to pests and diseases, and that this can reduce the need for chemical pesticides. Opponents, however, argue that GMOs are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. They point to the potential for unforeseen impacts on the environment, as well as the potential for health risks from consuming GMOs.

In conclusion, the debate over the use of GMOs is one that has been ongoing for many years. Proponents argue that they can be used to increase crop yields and reduce the use of pesticides, while opponents argue that they are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. While there is no easy answer to this debate, it is clear that both sides of the argument must be considered before a decision can be made.